Howard Digital

Landing pages

Pages that convert the traffic you already pay for.

Landing page builds and conversion work for paid campaigns, for clients in Dallas-Fort Worth and beyond. The cheapest media efficiency available to most businesses is on the page, not in the auction.

You cannot test your way out of a bad offer

This is the thing I most often have to say out loud, and it is rarely what a client wants to hear.

A great deal of conversion work is spent moving buttons, rewriting headlines and trying a new hero image, when the actual problem is that the offer is not compelling to the person arriving. The price is wrong for the market, or the terms are worse than the obvious alternative, or the thing being asked for is too big a commitment for a first interaction with a stranger. No amount of testing fixes that. You can grind out a small relative improvement on a page that fundamentally is not persuasive, and it will not change your business.

So I start with the offer and the promise before touching layout. What is being asked of the visitor, what do they get, why should they believe it, and how does that compare with what they can get elsewhere in ten seconds of searching. Sometimes the honest answer is that the page is fine and the offer needs work, and that is a conversation with you rather than a design task for me. I would rather have it in week one.

For lead generation, the form is the product

The form is the actual conversion surface. It is the moment the visitor decides whether you are worth the effort. It is also, reliably, the least considered element on the page.

The recurring problems are consistent enough to list. Too many fields, most of which exist because someone in sales asked for them years ago and nobody has since checked what they cost in completions. Inputs that bring up the wrong mobile keyboard, so entering a phone number becomes an annoyance. No inline validation, so the visitor learns about an error only after submitting and losing their place. No visible confirmation that anything happened. Optional fields that are not labeled as optional.

Each of those is small and none of them are interesting, which is exactly why they survive. Fixing them is often worth more than a redesign, and it is measurable within a couple of weeks.

Most tests never reach significance, and get called anyway

Testing culture has outrun testing math. A team runs a variant for ten days, sees 4.1 percent against 3.6 percent, declares a winner and rolls it out. At the traffic and conversion volumes most businesses actually have, a difference that size over that period is well within the range of ordinary noise. The "winner" then becomes the new baseline and the next test is run against a change that may never have been an improvement.

Before running a test I will work out how much traffic it needs to detect the size of effect you would care about, and how long that will take at your current volume. If the answer is four months, the test is not worth running, and we should make the change on judgment or find a bigger lever. That is a less exciting answer than a testing roadmap. It is a considerably cheaper one.

This also means small accounts should mostly not be A/B testing. If you get 40 conversions a month, your effort belongs on the offer, the traffic quality and the form, all of which produce changes large enough to see without statistics.

What building a page involves

How engagements usually work

Usually project-shaped: a page or a set of pages for a campaign, or a conversion review of what you already have. It pairs naturally with paid search or paid social, since a page built without knowing what the ads promise tends to convert like one.

Send me the page

A URL and what you wish it did better is enough. If the problem turns out to be the offer rather than the page, I will say so.

Start a conversation